February 10, 2024 Published

Urban Mobility Exercise - After Action Report

By Event Coordinator: Sam Rivera

Distance

8.2 km

Load

15 kg

Participants

12

Duration

1h 30m

Conditions: Light rain, 10°C, urban environment with varying surfaces

1 What Was Planned

  • 1. Test load-bearing capacity during urban mobility tasks
  • 2. Practice equipment transitions under time pressure
  • 3. Develop assistance approaches for mobility challenges
  • 4. Evaluate communication in busy urban environments

2 What Actually Happened

  • 1. Team adapted quickly to changing surface types (pavement to gravel to stairs)
  • 2. Equipment transfers completed within 90-second standard
  • 3. Assistance approaches showed improvement from previous exercises
  • 4. Clear communication and signaling effective in busy environments

3 What Went Well

  • Team adapted quickly to changing surface types (pavement to gravel to stairs)
  • Equipment transfers completed within 90-second standard
  • Assistance approaches showed improvement from previous exercises
  • Clear communication and signaling effective in busy environments

4 What Could Be Improved

  • Navigation accuracy in complex urban environments
  • Individual load distribution during obstacle negotiation
  • Communication clarity during simultaneous activities
  • Post-exercise equipment maintenance and accountability

5 Lessons Learned

  • 1 Urban environments present unique challenges not covered in standard terrain training
  • 2 Load distribution affects obstacle negotiation more than straight-line movement
  • 3 Redundant communication systems essential in built-up areas
  • 4 After-action gear maintenance prevents cumulative equipment failure